TMFG vs. TMFC
Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC).
TMFG and TMFC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMFG is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Jun 17, 2014. TMFC is a passively managed fund by Motley Fool that tracks the performance of the Motley Fool 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2018.
Performance
TMFG vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMFG vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | -6.31% | 6.75% | 15.45% | 28.36% | -28.17% | 1.21% |
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | -8.08% | 19.55% | 35.17% | 47.04% | -30.86% | 1.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a -6.31% return, which is significantly higher than TMFC's -8.08% return.
TMFG
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -6.31%
- YTD
- -6.31%
- 6M
- -5.36%
- 1Y
- 2.37%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFC
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -4.93%
- YTD
- -8.08%
- 6M
- -6.33%
- 1Y
- 18.78%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMFG vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMFG vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank
TMFG
TMFC
TMFG vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFG | TMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 0.93 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.33 | 1.47 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.21 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 1.52 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.57 | 5.42 | -4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFG | TMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 0.93 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.74 | -0.64 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFG and TMFC is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMFG vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison
TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than TMFC's 0.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 0.29% | 0.27% | 13.94% | 5.42% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.16% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% |
Drawdowns
TMFG vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, roughly equal to the maximum TMFC drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and TMFC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFG | TMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.66% | -33.06% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -12.64% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.06% | -9.95% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -6.88% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 3.54% | -0.11% |
Volatility
TMFG vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) have volatilities of 5.64% and 5.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMFG | TMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 5.76% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 10.52% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 20.21% | -3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 20.43% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 22.14% | -3.34% |