TMFG vs. POW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TMFG (Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TMFG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

TMFG vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 34.20% return.

TMFG

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: 2.53%
• 6M: 5.07%
• YTD: 5.76%
• 1Y: 8.13%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.47%

POW

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -8.71%
• 6M: 18.02%
• YTD: 34.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	$1.23M	$2.16M	$2.93M
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	$305.59K	$359.54K	$429.54K

TMFG vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	5.76%	-1.62%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	34.20%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFG and POW is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

TMFG vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMFG

TMFG Risk / Return Rank: 25
TMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
TMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 23
TMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMFG vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFG	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.33	—	—

Drawdowns

TMFG vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFG	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.66%	-28.02%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-21.15%	+21.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.16%	-5.60%	-4.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMFG	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.59%	34.35%	-20.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.45%	34.35%	-15.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.45%	34.35%	-15.90%

TMFG vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFG vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	0.26%	0.27%	13.94%	5.42%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFG and POW in my portfolio?

TMFG and POW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMFG or POW?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFG or POW?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFG or POW?

TMFG has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between TMFG and POW?

TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 0.75% for POW.