TMFG vs. MSTZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TMFG (Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TMFG returned 6.17% vs 159.07% for MSTZ. Their -0.39 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TMFG charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

TMFG vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -30.44% return.

TMFG

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 0.68%
• 6M: 3.85%
• YTD: 3.85%
• 1Y: 6.17%
• 3Y*: 11.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.06%

MSTZ

• 1D: 8.95%
• 1M: 7.38%
• 6M: -24.16%
• YTD: -30.44%
• 1Y: 159.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -86.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	$101.73M	$133.33M	$177.41M
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	$262.64K	$334.92K	$424.44K

TMFG vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	3.85%	6.75%	2.71%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-30.44%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFG and MSTZ is -0.40, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.39

Return for Risk

TMFG vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMFG

TMFG Risk / Return Rank: 19
TMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
TMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 22

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 61
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMFG vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFG	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	1.38	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	2.22	-1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.28	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	2.44	-2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.48	4.53	-3.05

TMFG vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFG and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMFG vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFG	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.66%	-99.38%	+65.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	-84.89%	+73.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-97.63%	+97.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.17%	-94.63%	+84.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	45.62%	-42.11%

Volatility

TMFG vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) is 3.52%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.86%. This indicates that TMFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMFG	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.52%	37.86%	-34.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.42%	134.52%	-124.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.51%	150.23%	-136.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.44%	169.87%	-151.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.44%	169.87%	-151.43%

TMFG vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFG vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	0.26%	0.27%	13.94%	5.42%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFG and MSTZ in my portfolio?

TMFG and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMFG or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to TMFG (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFG dropped -33.66% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, TMFG or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 159.07% vs 6.17% for TMFG. On fees, TMFG is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, TMFG has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMFG or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 159.07% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFG or MSTZ?

TMFG is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFG or MSTZ?

TMFG has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between TMFG and MSTZ?

TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.