TMFG vs. MFVL
TMFG (Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while MFVL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.
Performance
TMFG vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 0.39% return.
TMFG
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFG vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 1.99% | 0.44% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFG and MFVL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFG vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank
TMFG
MFVL
TMFG vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFG | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFG | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.31 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
TMFG vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFG | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.66% | -7.03% | -26.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -3.29% | +2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -2.42% | -8.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | — | — |
Volatility
TMFG vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFG | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 12.15% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 12.15% | +6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 12.15% | +6.45% |
TMFG vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFG vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 0.26% | 0.27% | 13.94% | 5.42% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFG and MFVL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFG.
TMFG has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while MFVL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 0.50% for MFVL.
Find the right allocation for TMFG and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer