TMFG vs. MFVL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TMFG (Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while MFVL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. Both are actively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TMFG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.

Performance

TMFG vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than MFVL's 7.45% return.

TMFG

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: 2.53%
• 6M: 5.07%
• YTD: 5.76%
• 1Y: 8.13%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.47%

MFVL

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 5.68%
• 6M: 5.87%
• YTD: 7.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	$60.88K	$51.81K	$91.23K
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	$305.59K	$359.54K	$429.54K

TMFG vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	5.76%	0.52%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	7.45%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFG and MFVL is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

TMFG vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMFG

TMFG Risk / Return Rank: 25
TMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
TMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 23
TMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

MFVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMFG vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFG	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.33	—	—

Drawdowns

TMFG vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and MFVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFG	MFVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.66%	-7.03%	-26.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.90%	+0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.16%	-2.52%	-7.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMFG	MFVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.59%	13.83%	-0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.45%	13.83%	+4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.45%	13.83%	+4.62%

TMFG vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFG vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	0.26%	0.27%	13.94%	5.42%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFG and MFVL in my portfolio?

TMFG and MFVL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMFG or MFVL?

On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFG or MFVL?

MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFG or MFVL?

TMFG has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.

What is the main difference between TMFG and MFVL?

TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while MFVL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 0.50% for MFVL.