TMFE vs. TMFS
TMFE (The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF) and TMFS (Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index, while TMFS is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. TMFE is passively managed, while TMFS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFE returned 16.91%/yr vs 7.66%/yr for TMFS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TMFS.
Performance
TMFE vs. TMFS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFE achieves a -1.15% return, which is significantly lower than TMFS's -0.78% return.
TMFE
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- -1.70%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFS
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- -4.22%
- 1Y
- -1.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- -2.26%
- 10Y*
- —
TMFE vs. TMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | -1.15% | 11.10% | 27.95% | 41.12% | -25.84% | -0.21% |
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | -0.78% | -1.59% | 15.41% | 25.40% | -33.15% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFE and TMFS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between TMFE and TMFS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
TMFE vs. TMFS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFE
TMFS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TMFE
TMFS
Consumer Cyclical
TMFE
TMFS
Communication Services
TMFE
TMFS
-
Consumer Defensive
TMFE
TMFS
Financial Services
TMFE
TMFS
Healthcare
TMFE
TMFS
Industrials
TMFE
TMFS
Basic Materials
TMFE
TMFS
Energy
TMFE
-
TMFS
Real Estate
TMFE
-
TMFS
Utilities
TMFE
-
TMFS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFE vs. TMFS — Risk / Return Rank
TMFE
TMFS
TMFE vs. TMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFE | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.01 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | -0.08 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | -0.21 | +2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFE vs. TMFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFE drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum TMFS drawdown of -48.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFE and TMFS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFE | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -48.79% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -15.73% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | -27.05% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -19.61% | +15.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -19.47% | +11.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 5.91% | -2.83% |
Volatility
TMFE vs. TMFS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) is 4.32%, while Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that TMFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFE | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 5.81% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 14.28% | -4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 20.01% | -7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 23.01% | -3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 25.50% | -6.27% |
TMFE vs. TMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TMFS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFE vs. TMFS - Dividend Comparison
TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 2.37% | 5.57% | 2.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFE and TMFS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFS has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to TMFE (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFE dropped -31.21% vs TMFS's -48.79%.
On 3-year performance, TMFE leads with 16.91% vs 7.66% for TMFS. On fees, TMFE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TMFE has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TMFE has performed better with a 16.91% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMFE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFS.
TMFE has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for TMFS.
TMFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TMFS is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: RBB Fund and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFE and 0.85% for TMFS.
TMFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFE and TMFS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer