TMFE vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMFE (The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

TMFE vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFE achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than BUFH's 2.45% return.

TMFE

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 1.24%
• 1Y: 7.52%
• 3Y*: 18.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFH

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFE vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF	1.48%	5.93%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.45%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFE and BUFH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

TMFE vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFE

TMFE Risk / Return Rank: 19
TMFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
TMFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
TMFE Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TMFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TMFE Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFE vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMFE	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.49	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMFE	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	2.91	-2.40

Drawdowns

TMFE vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFE drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFE and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFE	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.07%	-1.53%	-29.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	-0.05%	-1.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.27%	-0.18%	-8.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMFE	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.17%	2.37%	+9.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.26%	2.37%	+16.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.26%	2.37%	+16.89%

TMFE vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFE vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF	0.31%	0.32%	0.44%	0.45%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFE and BUFH in my portfolio?

TMFE and BUFH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMFE or BUFH?

On fees, TMFE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFE or BUFH?

TMFE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFE or BUFH?

TMFE has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between TMFE and BUFH?

TMFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: RBB Fund and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFE and 0.95% for BUFH.