PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TMFC vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TMFC vs. BRK-B

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, TMFC returned 14.15%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TMFC vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFC achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -1.96% return.

TMFC

1D
-1.24%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
4.32%
6M
3.34%
1Y
20.43%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
—

BRK-B

1D
0.84%
1M
1.32%
YTD
-1.96%
6M
-1.54%
1Y
1.03%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFC vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF		4.32%19.55%35.17%47.04%-30.86%25.30%42.00%34.70%-5.85%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.		-1.96%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%-5.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFC and BRK-B is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between TMFC and BRK-B has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Motley Fool 100 Index ETF

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

Often compared with TMFC:
TMFC vs. SPYTMFC vs. QQQTMFC vs. VOOTMFC vs. TMFXTMFC vs. TMFETMFC vs. QQQMTMFC vs. SCHG
Often compared with BRK-B:
BRK-B vs. SPYBRK-B vs. VOOBRK-B vs. BRK-ABRK-B vs. QQQBRK-B vs. ^NDXBRK-B vs. VTIBRK-B vs. VGT

Return for Risk

TMFC vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TMFC
TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFC vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TMFCBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
0.07

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.00
0.20

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.02

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

0.11

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

0.23

+5.64

TMFC vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFC Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFC and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMFC vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFC drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFC and BRK-B.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TMFCBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-53.86%

+20.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-9.42%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.06%

-14.95%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.06%

-26.58%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-29.57%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.87%

-8.71%

+3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-11.07%

+4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

4.57%

-1.08%

Volatility

TMFC vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.75%. This indicates that TMFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TMFCBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

3.75%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

10.63%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.27%

14.39%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.48%

17.10%

+3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.00%

19.39%

+2.61%

Dividends

TMFC vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF		0.14%0.14%0.40%0.26%0.27%0.23%0.42%0.50%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

TMFC and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMFC has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to BRK-B (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFC dropped -33.06% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

TMFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFC and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer