TMF vs. PST
TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) and PST (ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury) are both exchange-traded funds - TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while PST is a Inverse Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TMF returned -17.90%/yr vs 2.91%/yr for PST. At a correlation of -0.91, they often move in opposite directions. TMF charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for PST.
Performance
TMF vs. PST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -10.63% return, which is significantly lower than PST's 6.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed PST with an annualized return of -17.90%, while PST has yielded a comparatively higher 2.91% annualized return.
TMF
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- 6M
- -11.74%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 1Y
- -5.83%
- 3Y*
- -21.26%
- 5Y*
- -33.16%
- 10Y*
- -17.90%
PST
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 3.69%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 2.91%
TMF vs. PST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -10.63% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
PST ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury | 6.60% | -4.42% | 12.27% | 3.17% | 38.55% | 4.01% | -18.67% | -11.03% | 1.72% | -4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and PST is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | -0.91 |
The correlation between TMF and PST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.91 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. PST — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
PST
TMF vs. PST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMF | PST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.07 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 0.54 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 0.96 | -1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMF vs. PST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, which is greater than PST's maximum drawdown of -79.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and PST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | PST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.89% | -79.25% | -13.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -6.90% | -19.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.14% | -16.19% | -38.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.81% | -16.19% | -72.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.89% | -36.07% | -56.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.60% | -63.43% | -29.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.91% | -61.48% | +17.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.82% | 3.87% | +8.95% |
Volatility
TMF vs. PST - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) at 3.07%. This indicates that TMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | PST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 3.07% | +5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 7.14% | +12.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.62% | 9.43% | +18.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.54% | 15.59% | +30.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.72% | 13.29% | +30.43% |
TMF vs. PST - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMF has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PST's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMF vs. PST - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than PST's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PST ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury | 2.81% | 3.47% | 3.61% | 3.69% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.85% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.42% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMF and PST have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMF has higher volatility (8.51%) compared to PST (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs PST's -79.25%.
On 10-year performance, PST leads with 2.91% vs -17.90% for TMF. On fees, PST is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, PST has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PST has performed better with a 2.91% return vs -17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PST is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 2.81% for PST.
TMF is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while PST is Inverse Bonds. TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while PST tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TMF and 0.95% for PST.
PST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMF and PST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer