TMF vs. NFLX
TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) is Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TMF returned -16.87%/yr vs 23.92%/yr for NFLX. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TMF vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of -16.87%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.92% annualized return.
TMF
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 7.62%
- YTD
- -5.18%
- 6M
- -5.04%
- 1Y
- -1.79%
- 3Y*
- -19.82%
- 5Y*
- -31.10%
- 10Y*
- -16.87%
NFLX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -14.31%
- 6M
- -15.60%
- 1Y
- -33.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 23.92%
TMF vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -5.18% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -14.31% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 11.41% | 67.11% | 20.89% | 39.44% | 55.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and NFLX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | -0.07 |
The correlation between TMF and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
NFLX
TMF vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMF | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.81 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.78 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | -1.35 | +0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMF vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, which is greater than NFLX's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and NFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.89% | -81.99% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -43.35% | +16.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.31% | -43.35% | -12.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.81% | -75.95% | -12.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.89% | -75.95% | -16.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.15% | -40.01% | -52.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.70% | -24.91% | -18.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.96% | 25.19% | -13.23% |
Volatility
TMF vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 5.85%. This indicates that TMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 5.85% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.46% | 24.58% | -5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.49% | 33.05% | -4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.72% | 43.09% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.92% | 41.49% | +2.43% |
Dividends
TMF vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.11% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMF and NFLX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMF has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs NFLX's -81.99%.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMF and NFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer