PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMF vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMF vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of -16.87%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.92% annualized return.


TMF

1D
-0.93%
1M
7.62%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
-5.04%
1Y
-1.79%
3Y*
-19.82%
5Y*
-31.10%
10Y*
-16.87%

NFLX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-7.68%
YTD
-14.31%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-33.72%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
23.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMF vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
-5.18%-2.94%-35.95%-13.01%-72.60%-19.80%39.02%34.75%-11.01%22.72%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-14.31%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%

Correlation

The correlation between TMF and NFLX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009

-0.07

The correlation between TMF and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMF vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMF vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMFNFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.81

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

-0.78

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

-1.35

+0.94

TMF vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMF Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMF and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMF vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, which is greater than NFLX's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFNFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.89%

-81.99%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.51%

-43.35%

+16.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.31%

-43.35%

-12.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.81%

-75.95%

-12.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.89%

-75.95%

-16.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.15%

-40.01%

-52.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

-24.91%

-18.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.96%

25.19%

-13.23%

Volatility

TMF vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 5.85%. This indicates that TMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFNFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

5.85%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.46%

24.58%

-5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.49%

33.05%

-4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.72%

43.09%

+3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.92%

41.49%

+2.43%

Dividends

TMF vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
4.11%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMF and NFLX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMF has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMF and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer