PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMF vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMF vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -6.13% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of -16.56%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


TMF

1D
-1.14%
1M
1.22%
YTD
-6.13%
6M
-11.63%
1Y
0.90%
3Y*
-20.78%
5Y*
-30.52%
10Y*
-16.56%

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMF vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
-6.13%-2.94%-35.95%-13.01%-72.60%-19.80%39.02%34.75%-11.01%22.72%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TMF and DBO is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2009

-0.24

The correlation between TMF and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to -0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TMF vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMF
DBO

Financial Services

18.7%
116.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

TMF
18.7%
DBO
116.0%

Basic Materials

TMF

-

DBO

-

Communication Services

TMF

-

DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

TMF

-

DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

TMF

-

DBO

-

Energy

TMF

-

DBO

-

Healthcare

TMF

-

DBO

-

Industrials

TMF

-

DBO

-

Real Estate

TMF

-

DBO

-

Technology

TMF

-

DBO

-

Utilities

TMF

-

DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMF vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMF vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMFDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.38

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

4.44

-4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

9.02

-8.95

TMF vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMF and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMFDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

2.34

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.66

0.50

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.38

0.36

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

0.02

-0.16

Drawdowns

TMF vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, roughly equal to the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.89%

-90.18%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.51%

-18.19%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.31%

-28.20%

-28.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.81%

-37.68%

-51.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.89%

-61.69%

-31.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.23%

-51.38%

-40.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.63%

-62.25%

+18.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.49%

8.92%

+2.57%

Volatility

TMF vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) is 8.09%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that TMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.09%

12.61%

-4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.01%

28.20%

-9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.76%

34.46%

-5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.75%

32.29%

+14.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.92%

31.78%

+12.14%

TMF vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMF has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMF vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
4.15%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMF and DBO have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to TMF (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.37% vs -16.56% for TMF. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.37% return vs -16.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.

TMF is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TMF and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMF and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer