TMF vs. BRZU
TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) and BRZU (Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while BRZU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TMF returned -16.87%/yr vs -15.10%/yr for BRZU. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TMF charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for BRZU.
Performance
TMF vs. BRZU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than BRZU's 14.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed BRZU with an annualized return of -16.87%, while BRZU has yielded a comparatively higher -15.10% annualized return.
TMF
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- -5.18%
- 6M
- -5.04%
- 1Y
- -4.90%
- 3Y*
- -19.82%
- 5Y*
- -31.10%
- 10Y*
- -16.87%
BRZU
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -9.87%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 53.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.31%
- 5Y*
- -2.87%
- 10Y*
- -15.10%
TMF vs. BRZU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -5.18% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
BRZU Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares | 14.47% | 97.99% | -57.07% | 55.48% | 8.30% | -39.23% | -91.34% | 57.02% | -37.21% | 30.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and BRZU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013 | -0.05 |
The correlation between TMF and BRZU shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TMF vs. BRZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMF
BRZU
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
TMF
BRZU
Basic Materials
TMF
-
BRZU
Communication Services
TMF
-
BRZU
Consumer Cyclical
TMF
-
BRZU
Consumer Defensive
TMF
-
BRZU
Energy
TMF
-
BRZU
Healthcare
TMF
-
BRZU
Industrials
TMF
-
BRZU
Real Estate
TMF
-
BRZU
-
Technology
TMF
-
BRZU
Utilities
TMF
-
BRZU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. BRZU — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
BRZU
TMF vs. BRZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMF | BRZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.20 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 1.49 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 4.43 | -4.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMF vs. BRZU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, smaller than the maximum BRZU drawdown of -99.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and BRZU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | BRZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.89% | -99.71% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -35.97% | +9.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.31% | -58.25% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.81% | -65.00% | -23.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.89% | -98.11% | +5.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.15% | -99.18% | +7.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.70% | -89.55% | +45.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.96% | 12.06% | -0.10% |
Volatility
TMF vs. BRZU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) is 8.43%, while Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) has a volatility of 14.76%. This indicates that TMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | BRZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 14.76% | -6.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.46% | 39.95% | -20.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.49% | 50.10% | -21.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.72% | 55.45% | -8.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.92% | 82.91% | -38.99% |
TMF vs. BRZU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMF has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than BRZU's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMF vs. BRZU - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than BRZU's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRZU Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares | 2.33% | 2.39% | 8.73% | 3.24% | 4.70% | 6.29% | 0.78% | 0.95% | 1.04% | 0.74% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.11% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMF and BRZU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRZU has higher volatility (14.76%) compared to TMF (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs BRZU's -99.71%.
On 10-year performance, BRZU leads with -15.10% vs -16.87% for TMF. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BRZU has performed better with a -15.10% return vs -16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 2.33% for BRZU.
TMF is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while BRZU is Leveraged Equities. TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while BRZU tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TMF and 1.29% for BRZU.
BRZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMF and BRZU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer