TMED vs. TDVG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TMED (T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMED is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while TDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMED charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

TMED vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TMED

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDVG

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 17.57%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMED vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF	-7.14%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TMED and TDVG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026	0.13

Return for Risk

TMED vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMED

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 56
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMED vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMED	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.81	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.60	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.44	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.01	—

Drawdowns

TMED vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMED drawdown since its inception was -7.14%, smaller than the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMED and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMED	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.14%	-19.20%	+12.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.24%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.14%	-0.82%	-6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.00%	-3.73%	-1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.76%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMED	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.28%	9.79%	+56.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.28%	13.92%	+52.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.28%	13.90%	+52.38%

TMED vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMED has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMED vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

TMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMED and TDVG in my portfolio?

TMED and TDVG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMED or TDVG?

On fees, TMED is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMED or TDVG?

TMED is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMED or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for TMED.

What is the main difference between TMED and TDVG?

TMED is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while TDVG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TMED and 0.50% for TDVG.