TMCIX vs. RBESX
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) and RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX).
TMCIX is managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Jun 1, 1994. RBESX is managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011.
Performance
TMCIX vs. RBESX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMCIX vs. RBESX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMCIX RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund | -7.48% | -0.79% | 6.78% | 17.32% | -16.59% | 23.50% | 20.52% | 33.98% | -4.58% | 17.07% |
RBESX RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund | -1.18% | 14.64% | 6.90% | 15.63% | -14.57% | -3.45% | 7.02% | 15.39% | -5.05% | 12.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMCIX achieves a -7.48% return, which is significantly lower than RBESX's -1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, TMCIX has outperformed RBESX with an annualized return of 8.79%, while RBESX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return.
TMCIX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -10.15%
- YTD
- -7.48%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 2.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
RBESX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- -1.18%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 11.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMCIX vs. RBESX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMCIX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than RBESX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMCIX vs. RBESX — Risk / Return Rank
TMCIX
RBESX
TMCIX vs. RBESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) and RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMCIX | RBESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.10 | 2.32 | -2.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.30 | 3.32 | -3.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.50 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 2.57 | -2.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 10.97 | -10.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMCIX | RBESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 2.32 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.61 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.12 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.11 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMCIX and RBESX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TMCIX vs. RBESX - Dividend Comparison
TMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.41%, more than RBESX's 5.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMCIX RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund | 8.41% | 7.78% | 1.32% | 2.04% | 7.82% | 24.68% | 2.63% | 7.32% | 9.26% | 22.57% | 7.25% | 11.05% |
RBESX RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund | 5.16% | 5.58% | 6.59% | 6.60% | 7.85% | 3.37% | 3.58% | 5.94% | 3.78% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TMCIX vs. RBESX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMCIX drawdown since its inception was -57.70%, which is greater than RBESX's maximum drawdown of -51.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMCIX and RBESX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMCIX | RBESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.70% | -51.19% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -4.18% | -9.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.64% | -26.82% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.34% | -51.19% | +13.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.04% | -21.69% | +7.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.62% | -25.50% | +8.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 0.98% | +3.13% |
Volatility
TMCIX vs. RBESX - Volatility Comparison
RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) at 1.70%. This indicates that TMCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMCIX | RBESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 1.70% | +3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 2.86% | +9.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.21% | 4.80% | +16.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 6.91% | +13.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 36.88% | -16.16% |