TMCIX vs. FCPGX

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TMCIX having a -9.06% return and FCPGX slightly higher at -9.02%. Over the past 10 years, TMCIX has outperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 8.77%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.82% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TMCIX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TMCIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMCIX and FCPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than FCPGX's 1.05% yield.

The maximum TMCIX drawdown since its inception was -67.18%, which is greater than FCPGX's maximum drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMCIX and FCPGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) is 7.07%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that TMCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.