PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBESX vs. SFILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBESX vs. SFILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index Fund (SFILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBESX achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly lower than SFILX's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RBESX has underperformed SFILX with an annualized return of 4.37%, while SFILX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.32% annualized return.


RBESX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.42%
6M
1.37%
YTD
2.73%
1Y
10.14%
3Y*
9.98%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
4.37%
ALL TIME*
3.50%

SFILX

1D
2.55%
1M
1.83%
6M
5.17%
YTD
11.70%
1Y
23.05%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
8.32%
ALL TIME*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RBESX vs. SFILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBESX
RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund
2.73%14.64%6.90%15.63%-14.57%-3.45%7.02%15.39%-5.05%12.78%
SFILX
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index Fund
11.70%36.17%1.29%14.80%-14.89%9.69%7.50%19.58%-18.67%26.08%

Correlation

The correlation between RBESX and SFILX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.48

The correlation between RBESX and SFILX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (10 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBESX vs. SFILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RBESX
RBESX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RBESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBESX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RBESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBESX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SFILX
SFILX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SFILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SFILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFILX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RBESX vs. SFILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index Fund (SFILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBESXSFILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.30

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.99

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

6.81

+3.30

RBESX vs. SFILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBESX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the SFILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBESX and SFILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBESX vs. SFILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBESX drawdown since its inception was -51.19%, which is greater than SFILX's maximum drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBESX and SFILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBESXSFILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.19%

-43.13%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.18%

-11.35%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.13%

-11.95%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-32.29%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.19%

-43.13%

-8.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.58%

-1.48%

-17.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.33%

-8.14%

-17.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

3.31%

-2.28%

Volatility

RBESX vs. SFILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) is 0.88%, while Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index Fund (SFILX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that RBESX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBESXSFILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

4.32%

-3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

12.00%

-8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32%

14.17%

-9.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.98%

15.38%

-8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.87%

16.01%

+20.86%

RBESX vs. SFILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBESX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SFILX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBESX vs. SFILX - Dividend Comparison

RBESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than SFILX's 7.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBESX
RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund
4.50%5.58%6.59%6.60%7.85%3.37%3.58%5.94%3.78%3.67%0.00%0.00%
SFILX
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index Fund
7.53%8.41%4.71%3.11%4.88%6.00%1.98%2.78%5.77%1.41%2.45%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBESX and SFILX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFILX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to RBESX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBESX dropped -51.19% vs SFILX's -43.13%.

RBESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBESX and SFILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer