RBESX vs. RSDIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RBESX (RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund) and RSDIX (RBC Short Duration Fixed Income Fund) are both mutual funds - RBESX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by RBC, while RSDIX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by RBC. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RBESX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for RSDIX.

Performance

RBESX vs. RSDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) and RBC Short Duration Fixed Income Fund (RSDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RBESX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.42%
• 6M: 1.37%
• YTD: 2.73%
• 1Y: 10.14%
• 3Y*: 9.98%
• 5Y*: 4.09%
• 10Y*: 4.37%
• ALL TIME*: 3.50%

RSDIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RBESX RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RBESX vs. RSDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBESX RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund	2.73%	14.64%	6.90%	15.63%	-14.57%	-3.45%	7.02%	15.39%	-5.05%	12.78%
RSDIX RBC Short Duration Fixed Income Fund	-2.16%	4.86%	5.13%	5.52%	-4.00%	-0.06%	3.58%	5.47%	1.02%	2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between RBESX and RSDIX is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.30

The correlation between RBESX and RSDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RBESX vs. RSDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RBESX

RBESX Risk / Return Rank: 87
RBESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RBESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
RBESX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
RBESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RBESX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

RSDIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RBESX vs. RSDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) and RBC Short Duration Fixed Income Fund (RSDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBESX	RSDIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.11	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RBESX	RSDIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.58%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.33%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RBESX	RSDIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.55%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.32%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.98%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.87%	—	—

RBESX vs. RSDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBESX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than RSDIX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBESX vs. RSDIX - Dividend Comparison

RBESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than RSDIX's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RBESX RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund	4.50%	5.58%	6.59%	6.60%	7.85%	3.37%	3.58%	5.94%	3.78%	3.67%	0.00%	0.00%
RSDIX RBC Short Duration Fixed Income Fund	3.65%	4.75%	4.16%	2.71%	1.92%	2.24%	2.01%	2.68%	2.44%	2.01%	1.80%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBESX and RSDIX in my portfolio?

RBESX and RSDIX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.