PortfoliosLab logo
RBESX vs. EAPCX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RBESX and EAPCX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RBESX vs. EAPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RBESX:

1.47

EAPCX:

0.28

Sortino Ratio

RBESX:

1.89

EAPCX:

0.25

Omega Ratio

RBESX:

1.25

EAPCX:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

RBESX:

1.39

EAPCX:

0.12

Martin Ratio

RBESX:

5.48

EAPCX:

0.32

Ulcer Index

RBESX:

1.23%

EAPCX:

4.82%

Daily Std Dev

RBESX:

5.25%

EAPCX:

12.48%

Max Drawdown

RBESX:

-27.41%

EAPCX:

-50.10%

Current Drawdown

RBESX:

-1.05%

EAPCX:

-2.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBESX achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly lower than EAPCX's 5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, RBESX has underperformed EAPCX with an annualized return of 3.22%, while EAPCX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.74% annualized return.


RBESX

YTD

2.17%

1M

0.61%

6M

2.11%

1Y

7.76%

3Y*

7.18%

5Y*

4.00%

10Y*

3.22%

EAPCX

YTD

5.91%

1M

0.78%

6M

5.00%

1Y

3.25%

3Y*

1.00%

5Y*

16.78%

10Y*

5.74%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RBESX vs. EAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBESX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPCX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RBESX vs. EAPCX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBESX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RBESX is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RBESX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RBESX is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RBESX is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RBESX is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RBESX is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

EAPCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EAPCX is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EAPCX is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EAPCX is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EAPCX is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EAPCX is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EAPCX is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RBESX vs. EAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RBESX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the EAPCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBESX and EAPCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RBESX vs. EAPCX - Dividend Comparison

RBESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, more than EAPCX's 5.16% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RBESX
RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund
6.19%6.60%6.62%7.02%4.11%3.59%5.94%3.79%3.67%0.26%0.00%4.10%
EAPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
5.16%5.46%3.43%14.80%13.74%3.01%1.11%0.41%4.98%6.49%0.00%1.52%

Drawdowns

RBESX vs. EAPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBESX drawdown since its inception was -27.41%, smaller than the maximum EAPCX drawdown of -50.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBESX and EAPCX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RBESX vs. EAPCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) is 1.22%, while Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that RBESX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...