TLXIX vs. TILGX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX).
TLXIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. TILGX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006.
Performance
TLXIX vs. TILGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLXIX vs. TILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLXIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund | -4.07% | 20.13% | 14.63% | 20.06% | -17.26% | 16.63% | 17.02% | 25.84% | -6.96% | 18.87% |
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | -11.95% | 15.25% | 29.23% | 47.05% | -32.76% | 16.84% | 44.23% | 30.76% | -0.38% | 33.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLXIX achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly higher than TILGX's -11.95% return. Over the past 10 years, TLXIX has underperformed TILGX with an annualized return of 10.45%, while TILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.55% annualized return.
TLXIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.96%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
TILGX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -11.95%
- 6M
- -10.69%
- 1Y
- 14.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLXIX vs. TILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLXIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TILGX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TLXIX vs. TILGX — Risk / Return Rank
TLXIX
TILGX
TLXIX vs. TILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLXIX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 0.65 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.09 | +0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.70 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 2.38 | +3.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLXIX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.65 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.37 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.68 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.52 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLXIX and TILGX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLXIX vs. TILGX - Dividend Comparison
TLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than TILGX's 15.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLXIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund | 3.37% | 3.24% | 2.33% | 2.07% | 2.49% | 2.51% | 1.77% | 2.25% | 2.69% | 0.16% | 2.59% | 2.47% |
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | 15.76% | 13.87% | 6.41% | 0.22% | 0.42% | 10.49% | 37.04% | 4.41% | 14.12% | 3.83% | 1.82% | 3.80% |
Drawdowns
TLXIX vs. TILGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLXIX drawdown since its inception was -31.08%, smaller than the maximum TILGX drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLXIX and TILGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLXIX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -52.16% | +21.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -15.19% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.97% | -37.86% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.08% | -37.86% | +6.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -15.19% | +6.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -8.90% | +4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 4.47% | -2.18% |
Volatility
TLXIX vs. TILGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX) is 4.51%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that TLXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLXIX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 5.15% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 12.16% | -4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 22.10% | -7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 21.90% | -8.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 21.56% | -6.47% |