PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLXIX vs. TILGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLXIX vs. TILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLXIX achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than TILGX's 8.14% return. Over the past 10 years, TLXIX has underperformed TILGX with an annualized return of 11.88%, while TILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.75% annualized return.


TLXIX

1D
0.33%
1M
5.12%
YTD
11.45%
6M
12.12%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
11.88%

TILGX

1D
-0.06%
1M
5.43%
YTD
8.14%
6M
7.42%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
16.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLXIX vs. TILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLXIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund
11.45%20.13%14.63%20.06%-17.26%16.63%17.02%25.84%-6.96%18.87%
TILGX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class
8.14%15.25%29.23%47.05%-32.76%16.84%44.23%30.76%-0.38%33.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TLXIX and TILGX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009

0.89

The correlation between TLXIX and TILGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLXIX vs. TILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLXIX
TLXIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TLXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TLXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

TILGX
TILGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLXIX vs. TILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLXIXTILGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.29

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

1.66

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.29

5.60

+8.69

TLXIX vs. TILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLXIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the TILGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLXIX and TILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLXIXTILGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.62

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.54

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.78

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.57

+0.18

Drawdowns

TLXIX vs. TILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLXIX drawdown since its inception was -31.08%, smaller than the maximum TILGX drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLXIX and TILGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLXIXTILGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.08%

-52.16%

+21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-15.19%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-23.94%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

-37.86%

+12.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.08%

-37.86%

+6.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-8.85%

+4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

4.50%

-2.61%

Volatility

TLXIX vs. TILGX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) at 3.07%. This indicates that TLXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLXIXTILGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.07%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

11.33%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

15.56%

-4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

21.87%

-7.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

21.61%

-6.47%

TLXIX vs. TILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLXIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TILGX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLXIX vs. TILGX - Dividend Comparison

TLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than TILGX's 12.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TILGX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class
12.83%13.87%6.41%0.22%0.42%10.49%37.04%4.41%14.12%3.83%1.82%3.80%
TLXIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund
2.90%3.24%2.33%2.07%2.49%2.51%1.77%2.25%2.69%0.16%2.59%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLXIX and TILGX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLXIX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to TILGX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLXIX dropped -31.08% vs TILGX's -52.16%.

TLXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLXIX and TILGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer