TILGX vs. EWL
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL).
TILGX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006. EWL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Switzerland Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996.
Performance
TILGX vs. EWL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TILGX vs. EWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | -8.83% | 15.25% | 29.23% | 47.05% | -32.76% | 16.84% | 44.23% | 30.76% | -0.38% | 33.89% |
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | -0.77% | 32.92% | -2.80% | 17.67% | -18.89% | 20.20% | 11.80% | 31.58% | -9.21% | 23.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILGX achieves a -8.83% return, which is significantly lower than EWL's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, TILGX has outperformed EWL with an annualized return of 14.95%, while EWL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.
TILGX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- -8.83%
- 6M
- -8.00%
- 1Y
- 17.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
EWL
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 17.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TILGX vs. EWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EWL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TILGX vs. EWL — Risk / Return Rank
TILGX
EWL
TILGX vs. EWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TILGX | EWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.02 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.27 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.43 | 4.85 | -1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TILGX | EWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.02 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.50 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.58 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.35 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between TILGX and EWL is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TILGX vs. EWL - Dividend Comparison
TILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.22%, more than EWL's 1.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | 15.22% | 13.87% | 6.41% | 0.22% | 0.42% | 10.49% | 37.04% | 4.41% | 14.12% | 3.83% | 1.82% | 3.80% |
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 1.72% | 1.71% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 1.73% | 1.45% | 1.85% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 2.58% |
Drawdowns
TILGX vs. EWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILGX drawdown since its inception was -52.16%, roughly equal to the maximum EWL drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILGX and EWL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILGX | EWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.16% | -51.62% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -13.48% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.86% | -28.99% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.86% | -28.99% | -8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.17% | -8.57% | -3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -11.12% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 3.52% | +0.92% |
Volatility
TILGX vs. EWL - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) have volatilities of 6.44% and 6.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TILGX | EWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 6.55% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 10.81% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.33% | 16.93% | +5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 15.85% | +6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 16.36% | +5.23% |