TLXIX vs. TLZIX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX).
TLXIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. TLZIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009.
Performance
TLXIX vs. TLZIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLXIX vs. TLZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLXIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund | -4.07% | 20.13% | 14.63% | 20.06% | -17.26% | 16.63% | 17.02% | 25.84% | -6.96% | 18.87% |
TLZIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund | -3.64% | 18.86% | 13.52% | 18.98% | -16.69% | 14.86% | 16.26% | 24.52% | -6.39% | 18.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLXIX achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly lower than TLZIX's -3.64% return. Over the past 10 years, TLXIX has outperformed TLZIX with an annualized return of 10.45%, while TLZIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.85% annualized return.
TLXIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.96%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
TLZIX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- YTD
- -3.64%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLXIX vs. TLZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TLXIX and TLZIX have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TLXIX vs. TLZIX — Risk / Return Rank
TLXIX
TLZIX
TLXIX vs. TLZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLXIX | TLZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.12 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.63 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 6.27 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLXIX | TLZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.12 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.71 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLXIX and TLZIX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLXIX vs. TLZIX - Dividend Comparison
TLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than TLZIX's 3.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLXIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund | 3.37% | 3.24% | 2.33% | 2.07% | 2.49% | 2.51% | 1.77% | 2.25% | 2.69% | 0.16% | 2.59% | 2.47% |
TLZIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund | 3.96% | 3.82% | 2.49% | 2.11% | 2.62% | 2.93% | 1.95% | 2.26% | 2.68% | 0.18% | 2.64% | 0.31% |
Drawdowns
TLXIX vs. TLZIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLXIX drawdown since its inception was -31.08%, which is greater than TLZIX's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLXIX and TLZIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLXIX | TLZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -28.82% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -9.49% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.97% | -24.21% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.08% | -28.82% | -2.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -7.77% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -4.04% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.09% | +0.20% |
Volatility
TLXIX vs. TLZIX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX) at 4.18%. This indicates that TLXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLXIX | TLZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 4.18% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 7.43% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 13.17% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 12.79% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 13.89% | +1.20% |