TLTX vs. URA
TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. TLTX is actively managed, while URA is passively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLTX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
TLTX vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTX achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 4.66% return.
TLTX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 21.17%
- 3Y*
- 33.83%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- 16.20%
TLTX vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 1.95% | 6.02% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.66% | 14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTX and URA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTX vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
TLTX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
URA
TLTX vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLTX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLTX vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTX and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -93.54% | +87.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -49.25% | +47.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -74.89% | +72.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.69% | — |
Volatility
TLTX vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.28% | 51.33% | -42.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 43.91% | -34.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 37.94% | -28.66% |
TLTX vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTX vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
TLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.11%, more than URA's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 17.11% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.66% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTX and URA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.11%, compared with 4.66% for URA.
TLTX is categorized as Government Bonds, while URA is Uranium. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TLTX and 0.69% for URA.
Find the right allocation for TLTX and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer