PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTX vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTX vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.


TLTX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
-1.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTX vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLTX and BNO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025

-0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTX vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTX

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTX vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLTX vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTXBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.14

+0.49

Drawdowns

TLTX vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTX and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTXBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-87.06%

+80.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.05%

-10.29%

+6.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-40.17%

+37.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.45%

Volatility

TLTX vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTXBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.14%

41.46%

-32.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.14%

35.38%

-26.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.14%

36.68%

-27.54%

TLTX vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTX vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

TLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.79%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TLTX and BNO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 15.79%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

TLTX is categorized as Government Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TLTX and 0.90% for BNO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTX and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer