TLTX vs. BNO
TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. TLTX is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. TLTX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
TLTX vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.
TLTX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -1.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 90.47%
- 6M
- 86.00%
- 1Y
- 91.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
TLTX vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | -0.36% | 5.40% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 90.47% | -6.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTX and BNO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTX vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
TLTX
BNO
TLTX vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLTX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.14 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
TLTX vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTX and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -87.06% | +80.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.05% | -10.29% | +6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -40.17% | +37.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.45% | — |
Volatility
TLTX vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.14% | 41.46% | -32.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.14% | 35.38% | -26.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.14% | 36.68% | -27.54% |
TLTX vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTX vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
TLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.79%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 15.79% | 7.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTX and BNO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 15.79%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
TLTX is categorized as Government Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TLTX and 0.90% for BNO.
Find the right allocation for TLTX and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer