TLTW vs. QQQI
TLTW (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD), while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. TLTW is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, TLTW returned 9.45% vs 27.00% for QQQI. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLTW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
TLTW vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTW achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 10.58% return.
TLTW
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 9.45%
- 3Y*
- 1.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 27.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTW vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 1.90% | 11.36% | 0.37% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.58% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTW and QQQI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTW vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
TLTW
QQQI
TLTW vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLTW | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.70 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 11.63 | -7.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLTW vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTW drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, smaller than the maximum QQQI drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTW and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTW | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -20.00% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -9.61% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -2.69% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -2.21% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 2.23% | -0.18% |
Volatility
TLTW vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) is 2.31%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that TLTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTW | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 6.10% | -3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.85% | 11.35% | -5.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.68% | 14.10% | -6.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 17.34% | -5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 17.34% | -5.98% |
TLTW vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTW vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.68%, less than QQQI's 13.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.53% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 11.68% | 14.82% | 14.47% | 19.59% | 8.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTW and QQQI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQI has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to TLTW (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTW dropped -18.61% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 27.00% vs 9.45% for TLTW. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TLTW has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 27.00% return vs 9.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.53%, compared with 11.68% for TLTW.
TLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TLTW and 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLTW and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer