PortfoliosLab logo
TLTW vs. LQDW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TLTW and LQDW is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

TLTW vs. LQDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.61%
1.98%
TLTW
LQDW

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TLTW:

0.78

LQDW:

1.25

Sortino Ratio

TLTW:

1.08

LQDW:

1.75

Omega Ratio

TLTW:

1.14

LQDW:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

TLTW:

0.47

LQDW:

1.30

Martin Ratio

TLTW:

1.57

LQDW:

4.30

Ulcer Index

TLTW:

5.20%

LQDW:

1.44%

Daily Std Dev

TLTW:

10.51%

LQDW:

4.96%

Max Drawdown

TLTW:

-18.59%

LQDW:

-9.20%

Current Drawdown

TLTW:

-9.76%

LQDW:

-0.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTW achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly higher than LQDW's 2.68% return.


TLTW

YTD

3.90%

1M

0.69%

6M

1.06%

1Y

8.79%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LQDW

YTD

2.68%

1M

0.49%

6M

2.34%

1Y

6.30%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TLTW vs. LQDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDW's 0.34% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for TLTW: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
TLTW: 0.35%
Expense ratio chart for LQDW: current value is 0.34%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
LQDW: 0.34%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TLTW vs. LQDW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TLTW is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TLTW is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TLTW is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TLTW is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TLTW is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TLTW is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDW is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDW is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDW is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDW is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDW is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDW is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TLTW vs. LQDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for TLTW, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
TLTW: 0.78
LQDW: 1.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for TLTW, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
TLTW: 1.08
LQDW: 1.75
The chart of Omega ratio for TLTW, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
TLTW: 1.14
LQDW: 1.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for TLTW, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
TLTW: 0.47
LQDW: 1.30
The chart of Martin ratio for TLTW, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
TLTW: 1.57
LQDW: 4.30

The current TLTW Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the LQDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTW and LQDW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.78
1.25
TLTW
LQDW

Dividends

TLTW vs. LQDW - Dividend Comparison

TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.13%, less than LQDW's 15.29% yield.


Drawdowns

TLTW vs. LQDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTW drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, which is greater than LQDW's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTW and LQDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-9.76%
-0.50%
TLTW
LQDW

Volatility

TLTW vs. LQDW - Volatility Comparison

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) at 3.15%. This indicates that TLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
4.82%
3.15%
TLTW
LQDW