PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTI vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTI vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTI achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.90% return.


TLTI

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.91%
YTD
0.83%
6M
-0.98%
1Y
6.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTI vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TLTI
NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.83%4.31%-4.61%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.90%4.13%-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTI and BUCK is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024

0.38

TLTI vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLTI
BUCK

Technology

35.6%

-

Financial Services

11.8%
100.0%

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

TLTI
35.6%
BUCK

-

Financial Services

TLTI
11.8%
BUCK
100.0%

Communication Services

TLTI
11.2%
BUCK

-

Consumer Cyclical

TLTI
10.1%
BUCK

-

Healthcare

TLTI
8.5%
BUCK

-

Industrials

TLTI
8.3%
BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

TLTI
4.9%
BUCK

-

Energy

TLTI
3.5%
BUCK

-

Utilities

TLTI
2.4%
BUCK

-

Real Estate

TLTI
1.9%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

TLTI
1.8%
BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTI vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTI
TLTI Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TLTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTI Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTI Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTI vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLTIBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.54

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

6.11

-5.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.47

32.31

-29.84

TLTI vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTI and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTIBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

2.54

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

1.47

-1.45

Drawdowns

TLTI vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTI drawdown since its inception was -8.70%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTI and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTIBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-5.43%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-1.31%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-0.04%

-3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-0.49%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

0.25%

+2.46%

Volatility

TLTI vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that TLTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTIBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

0.70%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.43%

1.53%

+4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.48%

3.14%

+6.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.15%

3.49%

+7.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.15%

3.49%

+7.66%

TLTI vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTI vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

TLTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, less than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
TLTI
NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
6.31%6.33%0.57%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTI and BUCK have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTI has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTI dropped -8.70% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 7.95% vs 6.68% for TLTI. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 7.95% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TLTI.

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.42%, compared with 6.31% for TLTI.

TLTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: NEOS Investments and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TLTI and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTI and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer