PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTI vs. TLTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTI vs. TLTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) and Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTI achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than TLTP's 1.24% return.


TLTI

1D
0.08%
1M
2.24%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.37%
1Y
5.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTP

1D
0.34%
1M
2.05%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.07%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTI vs. TLTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLTI and TLTP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024

0.95

The correlation between TLTI and TLTP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTI vs. TLTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTI
TLTI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TLTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTP
TLTP Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TLTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTP Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTP Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTI vs. TLTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) and Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTITLTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.13

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

0.93

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

2.42

-0.48

TLTI vs. TLTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is comparable to the TLTP Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTI and TLTP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTI vs. TLTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTI drawdown since its inception was -8.70%, roughly equal to the maximum TLTP drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTI and TLTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTITLTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-8.54%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-5.76%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-2.19%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-3.24%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.21%

+0.60%

Volatility

TLTI vs. TLTP - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) at 1.68%. This indicates that TLTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTITLTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

1.68%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.56%

5.12%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

7.38%

+1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.10%

9.76%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.10%

9.76%

+1.34%

TLTI vs. TLTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTP's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTI vs. TLTP - Dividend Comparison

TLTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, less than TLTP's 13.03% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TLTI and TLTP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TLTI has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to TLTP (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTI dropped -8.70% vs TLTP's -8.54%.

On 1-year performance, TLTI leads with 5.45% vs 5.35% for TLTP. On fees, TLTP is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, TLTP has been the lower-risk option at 1.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TLTI has performed better with a 5.45% return vs 5.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTP is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TLTI.

TLTP has the higher dividend yield at 13.03%, compared with 6.77% for TLTI.

TLTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTP is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: NEOS Investments and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TLTI and 0.38% for TLTP.

TLTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTI and TLTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer