PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTE vs. QLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTE vs. QLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTE achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 4.13% return.


TLTE

1D
-5.06%
1M
0.90%
YTD
20.12%
6M
20.98%
1Y
39.95%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
9.47%

QLV

1D
0.43%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
4.13%
6M
3.50%
1Y
12.78%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTE vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TLTE
FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index
20.12%30.21%3.53%13.62%-17.31%4.79%12.10%4.94%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
4.13%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTE and QLV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.56

The correlation between TLTE and QLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

TLTE vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLTE
QLV

Technology

33.5%
31.1%

Financial Services

17.7%
11.8%

Industrials

10.5%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
6.4%

Basic Materials

7.0%
2.3%

Communication Services

4.2%
8.2%

Real Estate

4.1%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
8.1%

Energy

3.7%
5.2%

Utilities

2.9%
6.1%

Healthcare

2.8%
13.0%

Technology

TLTE
33.5%
QLV
31.1%

Financial Services

TLTE
17.7%
QLV
11.8%

Industrials

TLTE
10.5%
QLV
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TLTE
9.9%
QLV
6.4%

Basic Materials

TLTE
7.0%
QLV
2.3%

Communication Services

TLTE
4.2%
QLV
8.2%

Real Estate

TLTE
4.1%
QLV
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

TLTE
3.7%
QLV
8.1%

Energy

TLTE
3.7%
QLV
5.2%

Utilities

TLTE
2.9%
QLV
6.1%

Healthcare

TLTE
2.8%
QLV
13.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTE vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTE
TLTE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TLTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTE vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTEQLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.30

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.07

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

8.63

+2.97

TLTE vs. QLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the QLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTE and QLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTE vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTE drawdown since its inception was -44.21%, which is greater than QLV's maximum drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTE and QLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTEQLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.21%

-33.71%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

-6.19%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

-12.05%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.65%

-17.93%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-2.08%

-2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-3.98%

-8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

1.48%

+1.97%

Volatility

TLTE vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 2.05%. This indicates that TLTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTEQLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.78%

2.05%

+9.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.21%

5.53%

+13.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.00%

7.66%

+13.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

12.63%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

16.52%

+2.08%

TLTE vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTE vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison

TLTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than QLV's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.60%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTE
FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index
3.26%3.76%3.73%4.03%4.42%3.21%1.95%3.23%3.02%2.12%2.30%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTE and QLV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTE has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to QLV (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTE dropped -44.21% vs QLV's -33.71%.

On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 10.02% vs 7.23% for TLTE. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 10.02% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TLTE.

TLTE has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.60% for QLV.

TLTE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. TLTE tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TLTE and 0.22% for QLV.

TLTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTE and QLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer