TLTE vs. IPOS
TLTE (FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - TLTE tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index while IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TLTE returned 9.47%/yr vs 4.08%/yr for IPOS. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLTE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.
Performance
TLTE vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTE achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 48.14% return. Over the past 10 years, TLTE has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 9.47%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.08% annualized return.
TLTE
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 20.12%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 39.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
IPOS
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- 15.69%
- YTD
- 48.14%
- 6M
- 46.95%
- 1Y
- 76.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- -6.66%
- 10Y*
- 4.08%
TLTE vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTE FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index | 20.12% | 30.21% | 3.53% | 13.62% | -17.31% | 4.79% | 12.10% | 14.51% | -17.44% | 32.82% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 48.14% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 30.93% | -22.33% | 36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTE and IPOS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014 | 0.57 |
The correlation between TLTE and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TLTE vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TLTE
IPOS
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Technology
TLTE
IPOS
Financial Services
TLTE
IPOS
Industrials
TLTE
IPOS
Consumer Cyclical
TLTE
IPOS
Basic Materials
TLTE
IPOS
Communication Services
TLTE
IPOS
Real Estate
TLTE
IPOS
-
Consumer Defensive
TLTE
IPOS
Energy
TLTE
IPOS
Utilities
TLTE
IPOS
Healthcare
TLTE
IPOS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTE vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
TLTE
IPOS
TLTE vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLTE | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 4.46 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.60 | 13.34 | -1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLTE vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTE drawdown since its inception was -44.21%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTE and IPOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTE | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.21% | -73.09% | +28.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.04% | -17.17% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.43% | -34.08% | +16.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.65% | -69.93% | +37.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.21% | -73.09% | +28.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -37.05% | +31.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -32.02% | +19.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 5.72% | -2.27% |
Volatility
TLTE vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) is 11.78%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 15.81%. This indicates that TLTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTE | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 15.81% | -4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.21% | 29.95% | -10.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.00% | 32.50% | -11.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 27.95% | -10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 24.41% | -5.81% |
TLTE vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTE vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
TLTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than IPOS's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.32% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
TLTE FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index | 3.26% | 3.76% | 3.73% | 4.03% | 4.42% | 3.21% | 1.95% | 3.23% | 3.02% | 2.12% | 2.30% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTE and IPOS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to TLTE (11.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTE dropped -44.21% vs IPOS's -73.09%.
On 10-year performance, TLTE leads with 9.47% vs 4.08% for IPOS. On fees, TLTE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TLTE has been the lower-risk option at 11.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TLTE has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 4.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLTE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
TLTE has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.32% for IPOS.
TLTE tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TLTE and 0.80% for IPOS.
IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLTE and IPOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer