PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTE vs. IPOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTE vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTE achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 48.14% return. Over the past 10 years, TLTE has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 9.47%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.08% annualized return.


TLTE

1D
-5.06%
1M
0.90%
YTD
20.12%
6M
20.98%
1Y
39.95%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
9.47%

IPOS

1D
-4.56%
1M
15.69%
YTD
48.14%
6M
46.95%
1Y
76.08%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
-6.66%
10Y*
4.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTE vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLTE
FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index
20.12%30.21%3.53%13.62%-17.31%4.79%12.10%14.51%-17.44%32.82%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
48.14%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%30.93%-22.33%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTE and IPOS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.57

The correlation between TLTE and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TLTE vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLTE
IPOS

Technology

33.5%
50.2%

Financial Services

17.7%
7.3%

Industrials

10.5%
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
6.3%

Basic Materials

7.0%
3.8%

Communication Services

4.2%
0.3%

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.2%

Energy

3.7%
4.9%

Utilities

2.9%
3.1%

Healthcare

2.8%
14.9%

Technology

TLTE
33.5%
IPOS
50.2%

Financial Services

TLTE
17.7%
IPOS
7.3%

Industrials

TLTE
10.5%
IPOS
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TLTE
9.9%
IPOS
6.3%

Basic Materials

TLTE
7.0%
IPOS
3.8%

Communication Services

TLTE
4.2%
IPOS
0.3%

Real Estate

TLTE
4.1%
IPOS

-

Consumer Defensive

TLTE
3.7%
IPOS
4.2%

Energy

TLTE
3.7%
IPOS
4.9%

Utilities

TLTE
2.9%
IPOS
3.1%

Healthcare

TLTE
2.8%
IPOS
14.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTE vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTE
TLTE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TLTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTE vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTEIPOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

4.46

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

13.34

-1.73

TLTE vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTE and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTE vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTE drawdown since its inception was -44.21%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTE and IPOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTEIPOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.21%

-73.09%

+28.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

-17.17%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

-34.08%

+16.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.65%

-69.93%

+37.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.21%

-73.09%

+28.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-37.05%

+31.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-32.02%

+19.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

5.72%

-2.27%

Volatility

TLTE vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) is 11.78%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 15.81%. This indicates that TLTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTEIPOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.78%

15.81%

-4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.21%

29.95%

-10.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.00%

32.50%

-11.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

27.95%

-10.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

24.41%

-5.81%

TLTE vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTE vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

TLTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than IPOS's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.32%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%
TLTE
FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index
3.26%3.76%3.73%4.03%4.42%3.21%1.95%3.23%3.02%2.12%2.30%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTE and IPOS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to TLTE (11.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTE dropped -44.21% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

On 10-year performance, TLTE leads with 9.47% vs 4.08% for IPOS. On fees, TLTE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TLTE has been the lower-risk option at 11.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TLTE has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 4.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

TLTE has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.32% for IPOS.

TLTE tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TLTE and 0.80% for IPOS.

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTE and IPOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer