TLTE vs. ICOW
TLTE (FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - TLTE tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index while ICOW tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TLTE returned 7.43%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for ICOW. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLTE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
TLTE vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTE achieves a 23.54% return, which is significantly higher than ICOW's 17.35% return.
TLTE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 23.54%
- 6M
- 25.97%
- 1Y
- 45.35%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
ICOW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 18.03%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
TLTE vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTE FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index | 23.54% | 30.21% | 3.53% | 13.62% | -17.31% | 4.79% | 12.10% | 14.51% | -17.44% | 13.77% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 17.35% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 17.91% | -16.09% | 16.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTE and ICOW is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between TLTE and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
TLTE vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TLTE
ICOW
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Technology
TLTE
ICOW
Financial Services
TLTE
ICOW
-
Industrials
TLTE
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
TLTE
ICOW
Basic Materials
TLTE
ICOW
Communication Services
TLTE
ICOW
Energy
TLTE
ICOW
Real Estate
TLTE
ICOW
-
Consumer Defensive
TLTE
ICOW
Utilities
TLTE
ICOW
-
Healthcare
TLTE
ICOW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTE vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
TLTE
ICOW
TLTE vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLTE | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.50 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 4.87 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | 17.40 | -3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLTE | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.85 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.61 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.55 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
TLTE vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTE drawdown since its inception was -44.21%, roughly equal to the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTE and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTE | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.21% | -43.49% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.04% | -8.02% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.43% | -14.81% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.51% | -28.48% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -0.63% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -7.58% | -4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 2.24% | +1.08% |
Volatility
TLTE vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) at 3.99%. This indicates that TLTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTE | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | 3.99% | +3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.12% | 10.58% | +5.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.43% | 13.72% | +4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 16.64% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 18.46% | -0.06% |
TLTE vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTE vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
TLTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than ICOW's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.71% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLTE FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index | 3.04% | 3.76% | 3.73% | 4.03% | 4.42% | 3.21% | 1.95% | 3.23% | 3.02% | 2.12% | 2.30% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTE and ICOW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLTE has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to ICOW (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTE dropped -44.21% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 7.43% for TLTE. On fees, TLTE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLTE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
TLTE has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 2.71% for ICOW.
TLTE tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TLTE and 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLTE and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer