TLT vs. VGIT
TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) and VGIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - TLT tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index while VGIT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TLT returned -1.56%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for VGIT. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TLT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGIT.
Performance
TLT vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly higher than VGIT's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, TLT has underperformed VGIT with an annualized return of -1.56%, while VGIT has yielded a comparatively higher 1.26% annualized return.
TLT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- -1.27%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- -1.67%
- 5Y*
- -6.27%
- 10Y*
- -1.56%
VGIT
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.26%
TLT vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.05% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | -0.32% | 7.34% | 1.39% | 4.28% | -10.53% | -2.64% | 7.71% | 6.19% | 1.35% | 1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLT and VGIT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009 | 0.84 |
The correlation between TLT and VGIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLT vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank
TLT
VGIT
TLT vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLT | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.17 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 1.13 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | 3.36 | -2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLT | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 0.96 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.01 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 | 0.28 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.50 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
TLT vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, which is greater than VGIT's maximum drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and VGIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLT | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.35% | -16.05% | -32.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -2.83% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | -4.34% | -14.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.70% | -15.02% | -28.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.35% | -16.05% | -32.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.31% | -2.26% | -38.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -3.52% | -10.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 0.95% | +2.10% |
Volatility
TLT vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) at 1.06%. This indicates that TLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLT | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 1.06% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.50% | 2.33% | +4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.77% | 3.38% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 5.38% | +10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 4.50% | +10.40% |
TLT vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TLT vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison
TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than VGIT's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.86% | 3.79% | 3.67% | 2.73% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLT and VGIT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLT has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to VGIT (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLT dropped -48.35% vs VGIT's -16.05%.
On 10-year performance, VGIT leads with 1.26% vs -1.56% for TLT. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGIT has performed better with a 1.26% return vs -1.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 3.86% for VGIT.
TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while VGIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLT and 0.03% for VGIT.
VGIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLT and VGIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer