TLT vs. MU
TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TLT returned -1.75%/yr vs 55.83%/yr for MU. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TLT vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 244.07% return. Over the past 10 years, TLT has underperformed MU with an annualized return of -1.75%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.83% annualized return.
TLT
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- -1.38%
- 5Y*
- -6.53%
- 10Y*
- -1.75%
MU
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 35.46%
- YTD
- 244.07%
- 6M
- 307.41%
- 1Y
- 751.18%
- 3Y*
- 144.69%
- 5Y*
- 66.21%
- 10Y*
- 55.83%
TLT vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 0.27% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 244.07% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLT and MU is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2002 | -0.19 |
The correlation between TLT and MU shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (all time) to 0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLT vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
TLT
MU
TLT vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLT | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.78 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 24.91 | -24.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 94.64 | -93.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLT vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLT | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.35% | -98.25% | +49.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -30.28% | +22.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | -57.63% | +38.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.70% | -57.63% | +13.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.35% | -57.63% | +9.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.12% | -9.07% | -31.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.84% | -58.16% | +44.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 7.95% | -4.81% |
Volatility
TLT vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) is 2.83%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.86%. This indicates that TLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLT | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 32.86% | -30.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.64% | 57.74% | -51.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.68% | 69.66% | -59.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 53.18% | -37.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 50.12% | -35.21% |
Dividends
TLT vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.56% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLT and MU have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to TLT (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLT dropped -48.35% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLT and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer