TLT vs. CNDX.L

Last updated Jun 10, 2026

TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) and CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TLT returned -1.79%/yr vs 21.02%/yr for CNDX.L. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. TLT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CNDX.L.

Performance

TLT vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.L's 13.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TLT has underperformed CNDX.L with an annualized return of -1.79%, while CNDX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.02% annualized return.

TLT

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: -0.49%
• 6M: -1.03%
• 1Y: 4.17%
• 3Y*: -1.86%
• 5Y*: -6.70%
• 10Y*: -1.79%

CNDX.L

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 13.47%
• 6M: 12.34%
• 1Y: 32.47%
• 3Y*: 26.03%
• 5Y*: 16.08%
• 10Y*: 21.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLT vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF	-0.49%	4.25%	-8.05%	2.77%	-31.23%	-4.60%	18.15%	14.12%	-1.61%	9.18%
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	13.47%	19.75%	26.42%	56.22%	-33.49%	27.92%	48.25%	37.96%	-1.08%	31.91%

Correlation

The correlation between TLT and CNDX.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010	-0.12

The correlation between TLT and CNDX.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TLT vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLT

TLT Risk / Return Rank: 16
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 16

CNDX.L

CNDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 67
CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CNDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CNDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
CNDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CNDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLT vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLT	CNDX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	1.99	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	2.79	-2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.34	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	2.94	-2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.35	10.44	-9.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLT vs. CNDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLT and CNDX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLT	CNDX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	1.99	-1.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.42	0.77	-1.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.12	1.04	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	1.02	-0.76

Drawdowns

TLT vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, which is greater than CNDX.L's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and CNDX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLT	CNDX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.35%	-35.21%	-13.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.58%	-11.00%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.18%	-22.44%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.70%	-35.21%	-8.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.35%	-35.21%	-13.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.57%	-5.89%	-34.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.83%	-5.13%	-8.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	3.10%	0.00%

Volatility

TLT vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) is 2.67%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that TLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLT	CNDX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	5.93%	-3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.52%	12.40%	-5.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.60%	16.22%	-6.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.85%	20.96%	-5.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.91%	20.11%	-5.20%

TLT vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLT vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison

TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, while CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF	4.60%	4.43%	4.30%	3.38%	2.67%	1.50%	1.50%	2.27%	2.63%	2.43%	2.60%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLT and CNDX.L in my portfolio?

TLT and CNDX.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TLT or CNDX.L?

On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLT or CNDX.L?

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CNDX.L.

What is the main difference between TLT and CNDX.L?

TLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while CNDX.L is Nasdaq-100. TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLT and 0.33% for CNDX.L.