CNDX.L vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
CNDX.L and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNDX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Blackrock Financial Management that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both CNDX.L and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNDX.L or CSPX.L.
Performance
CNDX.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNDX.L achieves a 21.52% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.L's 24.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CNDX.L has outperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of 17.74%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.76% annualized return.
CNDX.L
21.52%
0.68%
10.53%
30.09%
20.19%
17.74%
CSPX.L
24.07%
0.44%
11.62%
32.01%
15.02%
12.76%
Key characteristics
| CNDX.L | CSPX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.75 | 2.77 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.39 | 3.83 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.52 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.34 | 4.18 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.20 | 17.93 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.51% | 1.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.41% | 11.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.17% | -33.90% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.94% | -2.13% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNDX.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNDX.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between CNDX.L and CSPX.L is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNDX.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNDX.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
CNDX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while CSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.16% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CNDX.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.17%, roughly equal to the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.L and CSPX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNDX.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that CNDX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.