PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLT vs. BNDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TLT vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TLT vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.17%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-1.31%
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.22%-8.17%-6.65%4.02%-17.48%5.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 3.22% return.


TLT

1D
-0.10%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
0.17%
6M
-0.87%
1Y
-0.49%
3Y*
-2.78%
5Y*
-5.85%
10Y*
-1.38%

BNDD

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.24%
YTD
3.22%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
-5.11%
3Y*
-4.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TLT vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TLT vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDD
BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLT vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLTBNDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.04

-0.41

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.02

-0.48

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.94

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

-0.37

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.11

-0.56

+0.68

TLT vs. BNDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the BNDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLT and BNDD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTBNDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

-0.41

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

-0.35

+0.61

Correlation

The correlation between TLT and BNDD is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TLT vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison

TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than BNDD's 3.64% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.49%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.64%3.82%3.85%4.30%43.17%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TLT vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, which is greater than BNDD's maximum drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and BNDD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTBNDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.35%

-30.87%

-17.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.23%

-10.93%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.17%

-27.28%

-12.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-19.03%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

7.26%

-2.88%

Volatility

TLT vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) at 3.52%. This indicates that TLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TLTBNDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

3.52%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

8.09%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

12.44%

-1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

13.55%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

13.55%

+1.38%