PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLSTX vs. GTLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLSTX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund (TLSTX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLSTX achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than GTLOX's 20.80% return.


TLSTX

1D
1.60%
1M
-0.78%
6M
8.02%
YTD
9.68%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.50%

GTLOX

1D
1.19%
1M
0.25%
6M
16.60%
YTD
20.80%
1Y
38.19%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
12.11%
ALL TIME*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TLSTX vs. GTLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TLSTX
TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund
9.68%17.08%23.66%25.90%-19.24%25.61%20.74%15.48%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
20.80%14.39%13.86%16.66%-15.37%27.05%7.41%10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TLSTX and GTLOX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.92

The correlation between TLSTX and GTLOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLSTX vs. GTLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLSTX
TLSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TLSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TLSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLSTX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund (TLSTX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLSTXGTLOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

4.80

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

19.41

-10.37

TLSTX vs. GTLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLSTX and GTLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLSTX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLSTX drawdown since its inception was -34.91%, smaller than the maximum GTLOX drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLSTX and GTLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLSTXGTLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.91%

-54.09%

+19.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-7.47%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-32.85%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-32.85%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-1.67%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-8.28%

+2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.87%

+0.17%

Volatility

TLSTX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund (TLSTX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) have volatilities of 3.37% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLSTXGTLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

3.35%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

11.66%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

14.89%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

21.97%

-4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

20.92%

-0.96%

TLSTX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLSTX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLSTX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

TLSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than GTLOX's 14.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
14.76%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%
TLSTX
TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund
5.00%5.48%2.73%2.22%3.82%1.38%1.84%2.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLSTX and GTLOX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLSTX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to GTLOX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLSTX dropped -34.91% vs GTLOX's -54.09%.

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLSTX and GTLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer