PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLSTX vs. FLCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLSTX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund (TLSTX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLSTX achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than FLCPX's 9.81% return.


TLSTX

1D
1.12%
1M
0.80%
YTD
10.39%
6M
9.63%
1Y
27.08%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*

FLCPX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.81%
6M
8.81%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
21.42%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
15.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLSTX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TLSTX
TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund
10.39%17.08%23.66%25.90%-19.24%25.61%20.74%15.48%
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
9.81%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%28.61%18.24%13.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TLSTX and FLCPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.98

The correlation between TLSTX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLSTX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLSTX
TLSTX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TLSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TLSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLSTX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund (TLSTX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLSTXFLCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.03

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.62

13.66

-0.04

TLSTX vs. FLCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FLCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLSTX and FLCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLSTX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLSTX drawdown since its inception was -34.91%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCPX drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLSTX and FLCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLSTXFLCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.91%

-33.87%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-8.89%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-18.76%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-24.40%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-1.71%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-4.17%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.97%

0.00%

Volatility

TLSTX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund (TLSTX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) have volatilities of 4.82% and 4.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLSTXFLCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

4.67%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

9.90%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

12.51%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

17.16%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.07%

18.21%

+1.86%

TLSTX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLSTX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TLSTX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

TLSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than FLCPX's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.51%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%
TLSTX
TIAA-CREF Life Funds Stock Index Fund
4.96%5.48%2.73%2.22%3.82%1.38%1.84%2.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, TLSTX and FLCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TLSTX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FLCPX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLSTX dropped -34.91% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLSTX and FLCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer