PortfoliosLab logo
GTLOX vs. GTLLX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GTLOX and GTLLX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

GTLOX vs. GTLLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GTLOX:

-0.54

GTLLX:

0.43

Sortino Ratio

GTLOX:

-0.52

GTLLX:

0.79

Omega Ratio

GTLOX:

0.89

GTLLX:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

GTLOX:

-0.32

GTLLX:

0.47

Martin Ratio

GTLOX:

-0.94

GTLLX:

1.62

Ulcer Index

GTLOX:

15.90%

GTLLX:

6.55%

Daily Std Dev

GTLOX:

27.23%

GTLLX:

23.48%

Max Drawdown

GTLOX:

-54.09%

GTLLX:

-54.32%

Current Drawdown

GTLOX:

-38.87%

GTLLX:

-6.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLOX achieves a -1.79% return, which is significantly lower than GTLLX's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GTLOX has underperformed GTLLX with an annualized return of -0.33%, while GTLLX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.69% annualized return.


GTLOX

YTD

-1.79%

1M

11.39%

6M

-21.47%

1Y

-14.60%

3Y*

-7.25%

5Y*

-2.01%

10Y*

-0.33%

GTLLX

YTD

1.15%

1M

17.46%

6M

2.77%

1Y

10.12%

3Y*

15.50%

5Y*

15.10%

10Y*

12.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GTLOX vs. GTLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GTLOX and GTLLX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GTLOX vs. GTLLX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLOX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GTLOX is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GTLOX is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GTLOX is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GTLOX is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GTLOX is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GTLOX is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

GTLLX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GTLLX is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GTLLX is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GTLLX is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GTLLX is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GTLLX is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GTLLX is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GTLOX vs. GTLLX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GTLOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the GTLLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLOX and GTLLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GTLOX vs. GTLLX - Dividend Comparison

GTLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while GTLLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
1.02%1.13%1.00%1.42%0.77%1.08%1.11%1.35%0.86%1.08%1.01%0.90%
GTLLX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.15%0.39%0.15%0.38%0.49%0.62%0.46%0.58%0.61%0.53%

Drawdowns

GTLOX vs. GTLLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLOX drawdown since its inception was -54.09%, roughly equal to the maximum GTLLX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLOX and GTLLX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GTLOX vs. GTLLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) is 5.08%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that GTLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...