PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTLOX vs. GTCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTLOX vs. GTCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLOX achieves a 21.11% return, which is significantly higher than GTCSX's 18.40% return. Over the past 10 years, GTLOX has outperformed GTCSX with an annualized return of 12.23%, while GTCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.


GTLOX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.51%
6M
15.82%
YTD
21.11%
1Y
38.54%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
12.23%
ALL TIME*
10.30%

GTCSX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.39%
6M
11.64%
YTD
18.40%
1Y
30.20%
3Y*
8.86%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
9.93%
ALL TIME*
7.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GTLOX vs. GTCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
21.11%14.39%13.86%16.66%-15.37%27.05%7.41%23.27%-7.97%24.78%
GTCSX
Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio
18.40%-1.95%8.50%16.93%-10.91%28.87%15.65%21.12%-16.17%15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GTLOX and GTCSX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.89

The correlation between GTLOX and GTCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTLOX vs. GTCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

GTCSX
GTCSX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GTCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
GTCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTLOX vs. GTCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTLOXGTCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

2.48

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.11

8.19

+11.92

GTLOX vs. GTCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTLOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the GTCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLOX and GTCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTLOX vs. GTCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLOX drawdown since its inception was -54.09%, smaller than the maximum GTCSX drawdown of -59.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLOX and GTCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTLOXGTCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.09%

-59.45%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-11.13%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.85%

-28.54%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-28.54%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

-49.50%

+11.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-0.62%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-11.95%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

3.38%

-1.52%

Volatility

GTLOX vs. GTCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) is 3.22%, while Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that GTLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTLOXGTCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

4.06%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

11.92%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.87%

17.62%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

20.80%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

23.26%

-2.34%

GTLOX vs. GTCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTLOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GTCSX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTLOX vs. GTCSX - Dividend Comparison

GTLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.72%, more than GTCSX's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTCSX
Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio
6.92%8.24%4.29%8.45%12.65%4.43%0.14%0.23%19.39%10.74%1.94%1.11%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
14.72%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTLOX and GTCSX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTCSX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to GTLOX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTLOX dropped -54.09% vs GTCSX's -59.45%.

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTLOX and GTCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer