TLA vs. FBL
TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for FBL.
Performance
TLA vs. FBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLA
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBL
- 1D
- -11.22%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- -27.71%
- 6M
- -31.07%
- 1Y
- -39.76%
- 3Y*
- 29.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLA vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 3.78% |
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | -32.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLA and FBL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLA vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank
TLA
FBL
TLA vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLA | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.03 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
TLA vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum FBL drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and FBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLA | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -61.15% | +55.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -61.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -61.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -53.15% | +51.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -16.49% | +15.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 33.06% | — |
Volatility
TLA vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLA | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 71.03% | -56.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 71.25% | -56.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 71.25% | -56.83% |
TLA vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FBL's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLA vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison
TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than FBL's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | 2.87% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 51.58% |
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLA and FBL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLA is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLA is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for FBL.
TLA has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 2.87% for FBL.
TLA is categorized as Derivative Income, while FBL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 1.15% for FBL.
Find the right allocation for TLA and FBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer