TJAN vs. QFLR

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TJAN is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TJAN returned 7.84% vs 22.36% for QFLR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

TJAN vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJAN achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than QFLR's 2.95% return.

TJAN

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 7.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: -3.63%
• 1M: -1.45%
• YTD: 2.95%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJAN vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027	2.43%	7.40%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	2.95%	17.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TJAN and QFLR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.75

The correlation between TJAN and QFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TJAN vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJAN

TJAN Risk / Return Rank: 89
TJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
TJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
TJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 62
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 61
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJAN vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TJAN	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	1.89	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	2.50	+1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.36	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	2.95	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.86	12.46	+7.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TJAN vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJAN and QFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TJAN	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	1.89	+0.94
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	1.22	+0.36

Drawdowns

TJAN vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJAN and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TJAN	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-13.97%	+9.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.10%	-7.61%	+5.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-4.16%	+3.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-2.50%	+2.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.40%	1.80%	-1.40%

Volatility

TJAN vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) is 0.47%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that TJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TJAN	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.47%	4.48%	-4.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.16%	8.87%	-6.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79%	11.87%	-9.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.41%	12.83%	-8.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.41%	12.83%	-8.42%

TJAN vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

TJAN vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither TJAN nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%
TJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TJAN and QFLR in my portfolio?

TJAN and QFLR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TJAN or QFLR?

QFLR has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to TJAN (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJAN dropped -4.83% vs QFLR's -13.97%.

Which ETF is better, TJAN or QFLR?

On 1-year performance, QFLR leads with 22.36% vs 7.84% for TJAN. On fees, TJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, TJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TJAN or QFLR?

Over the 1-year period, QFLR has performed better with a 22.36% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TJAN or QFLR?

TJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TJAN or QFLR?

TJAN and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TJAN and QFLR?

TJAN is categorized as Options Trading, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJAN and 0.89% for QFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.