TIPB vs. PBTP
TIPB (Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. TIPB is actively managed, while PBTP is passively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TIPB charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PBTP.
Performance
TIPB vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than PBTP's 1.86% return.
TIPB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PBTP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 3.00%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.49M | $1.29M | $1.24M | |
| $2.11K | $9.22K | $33.66K |
TIPB vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.32% | 0.79% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 1.86% | 1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPB and PBTP is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPB vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank
TIPB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PBTP
TIPB vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIPB | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIPB vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, smaller than the maximum PBTP drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and PBTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPB | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -5.44% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.30% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -0.74% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
TIPB vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPB | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60% | 1.60% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 2.84% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 2.63% | -0.03% |
TIPB vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIPB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TIPB vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison
TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than PBTP's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 4.80% | 3.82% | 2.59% | 2.36% | 5.33% | 3.12% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 2.33% | 0.73% |
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 4.16% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPB and PBTP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TIPB.
PBTP has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.16% for TIPB.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPB and 0.07% for PBTP.
Find the right allocation for TIPB and PBTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer