PBTP vs. SCHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ).
PBTP and SCHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PBTP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). It was launched on Sep 22, 2017. SCHQ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Government - Treasury - Long. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. Both PBTP and SCHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PBTP or SCHQ.
Correlation
The correlation between PBTP and SCHQ is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PBTP vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PBTP:
3.41
SCHQ:
-0.02
PBTP:
5.48
SCHQ:
0.06
PBTP:
1.70
SCHQ:
1.01
PBTP:
7.35
SCHQ:
-0.01
PBTP:
21.97
SCHQ:
-0.04
PBTP:
0.27%
SCHQ:
6.10%
PBTP:
1.75%
SCHQ:
12.51%
PBTP:
-5.42%
SCHQ:
-46.13%
PBTP:
0.00%
SCHQ:
-38.94%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBTP achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than SCHQ's 1.51% return.
PBTP
1.32%
0.78%
2.39%
6.04%
3.47%
N/A
SCHQ
1.51%
1.67%
-7.55%
0.28%
-6.60%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBTP vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBTP has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PBTP vs. SCHQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PBTP
SCHQ
PBTP vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PBTP vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison
PBTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than SCHQ's 4.55% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 2.56% | 2.59% | 2.36% | 5.33% | 3.12% | 1.26% | 2.12% | 2.33% | 0.73% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.55% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.52% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PBTP vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBTP drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBTP and SCHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PBTP vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) is 0.43%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that PBTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.