PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINY vs. UVXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINY vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 55.32% return, which is significantly higher than UVXY's -34.93% return.


TINY

1D
-2.10%
1M
-7.89%
6M
33.37%
YTD
55.32%
1Y
83.39%
3Y*
27.14%
5Y*
10Y*

UVXY

1D
2.95%
1M
-9.52%
6M
-33.79%
YTD
-34.93%
1Y
-73.19%
3Y*
-62.17%
5Y*
-68.33%
10Y*
-72.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
55.32%19.98%6.63%47.97%-34.14%8.60%
UVXY
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
-34.93%-65.32%-50.90%-87.70%-44.81%-24.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and UVXY is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021

-0.59

The correlation between TINY and UVXY shifts across timeframes, from -0.59 (all time) to -0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINY vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

UVXY
UVXY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
UVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
UVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TINYUVXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.82

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

-0.99

+6.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.29

-1.48

+16.77

TINY vs. UVXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the UVXY Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and UVXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TINY vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and UVXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINYUVXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.79%

-100.00%

+56.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.75%

-73.88%

+57.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.13%

-95.42%

+53.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.81%

-100.00%

+85.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-98.76%

+82.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.47%

49.56%

-44.09%

Volatility

TINY vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) have volatilities of 16.86% and 17.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINYUVXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.86%

17.16%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.43%

66.78%

-35.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.06%

85.47%

-48.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.14%

103.82%

-70.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.14%

112.00%

-78.86%

TINY vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than UVXY's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINY vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while UVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.17%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%
UVXY
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINY and UVXY have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UVXY has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to TINY (16.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs UVXY's -100.00%.

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 27.14% vs -62.17% for UVXY. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TINY has been the lower-risk option at 16.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 27.14% return vs -62.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UVXY.

TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for UVXY.

TINY is categorized as Technology Equities, while UVXY is Volatility. TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.95% for UVXY.

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINY and UVXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer