TINY vs. IPAY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TINY tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index while IPAY tracks the Prime Mobile Payments Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINY returned 32.44%/yr vs 2.21%/yr for IPAY. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IPAY.

Performance

TINY vs. IPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 66.66% return, which is significantly higher than IPAY's -16.12% return.

TINY

• 1D: -6.24%
• 1M: 10.57%
• YTD: 66.66%
• 6M: 66.53%
• 1Y: 113.36%
• 3Y*: 32.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPAY

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -3.52%
• YTD: -16.12%
• 6M: -17.27%
• 1Y: -23.67%
• 3Y*: 2.21%
• 5Y*: -9.21%
• 10Y*: 6.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. IPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	66.66%	19.98%	6.63%	47.97%	-34.14%	8.60%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	-16.12%	-9.55%	25.88%	18.21%	-32.38%	-16.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and IPAY is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between TINY and IPAY has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TINY vs. IPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINY	IPAY
Technology	70.5%	53.9%
Healthcare	10.4%	-
Basic Materials	9.8%	-
Industrials	4.8%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	41.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TINY vs. IPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 91
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 86
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

IPAY

IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 2
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. IPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINY	IPAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.30	-1.00	+4.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	-1.28	+5.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	0.84	+0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.81	-0.76	+7.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.81	-1.36	+25.17

TINY vs. IPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the IPAY Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and IPAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TINY vs. IPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum IPAY drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and IPAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINY	IPAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.79%	-51.75%	+7.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.75%	-31.31%	+14.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.13%	-32.74%	-9.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-51.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.24%	-39.27%	+33.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.99%	-16.77%	+0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.78%	17.46%	-12.68%

Volatility

TINY vs. IPAY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) at 7.88%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINY	IPAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.31%	7.88%	+5.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.58%	18.78%	+9.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.52%	23.92%	+10.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.69%	26.15%	+6.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.69%	25.39%	+7.30%

TINY vs. IPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than IPAY's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINY vs. IPAY - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than IPAY's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	0.94%	0.79%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.18%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINY and IPAY in my portfolio?

TINY and IPAY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINY or IPAY?

TINY has higher volatility (13.31%) compared to IPAY (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs IPAY's -51.75%.

Which ETF is better, TINY or IPAY?

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 32.44% vs 2.21% for IPAY. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, IPAY has been the lower-risk option at 7.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINY or IPAY?

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 32.44% return vs 2.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINY or IPAY?

TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IPAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINY or IPAY?

IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.18% for TINY.

What is the main difference between TINY and IPAY?

TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while IPAY tracks Prime Mobile Payments Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.75% for IPAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.