TINY vs. CBT
TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while CBT (Cabot Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, TINY returned 35.32%/yr vs 14.76%/yr for CBT. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TINY vs. CBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 77.76% return, which is significantly higher than CBT's 38.41% return.
TINY
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 17.94%
- YTD
- 77.76%
- 6M
- 77.75%
- 1Y
- 128.45%
- 3Y*
- 35.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBT
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 9.33%
- YTD
- 38.41%
- 6M
- 39.63%
- 1Y
- 26.93%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
TINY vs. CBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 77.76% | 19.98% | 6.63% | 47.97% | -34.14% | 8.60% |
CBT Cabot Corporation | 38.41% | -25.68% | 11.25% | 27.63% | 21.38% | 4.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINY and CBT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021 | 0.51 |
The correlation between TINY and CBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINY vs. CBT — Risk / Return Rank
TINY
CBT
TINY vs. CBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Cabot Corporation (CBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TINY | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.17 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.71 | 0.94 | +6.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.08 | 2.25 | +24.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINY vs. CBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum CBT drawdown of -82.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and CBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINY | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.79% | -82.87% | +39.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.75% | -28.82% | +12.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.13% | -48.78% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -19.40% | +19.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.00% | -20.83% | +4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 12.02% | -7.26% |
Volatility
TINY vs. CBT - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 11.12% compared to Cabot Corporation (CBT) at 10.43%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINY | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.12% | 10.43% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 23.01% | +4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.95% | 32.59% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.57% | 33.60% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.57% | 35.40% | -2.83% |
Dividends
TINY vs. CBT - Dividend Comparison
TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than CBT's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBT Cabot Corporation | 2.01% | 2.69% | 1.85% | 1.88% | 2.21% | 2.53% | 3.12% | 2.90% | 3.04% | 2.02% | 2.22% | 2.15% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINY and CBT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TINY has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to CBT (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs CBT's -82.87%.
TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TINY and CBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer