PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINY vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINY vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 59.78% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 11.15% return.


TINY

1D
2.63%
1M
15.50%
YTD
59.78%
6M
60.21%
1Y
114.15%
3Y*
31.25%
5Y*
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
-0.91%
1M
4.92%
YTD
11.15%
6M
13.89%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
59.78%19.98%6.63%47.97%-34.14%8.73%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
11.15%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%-1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and BOTZ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.81

The correlation between TINY and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TINY vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TINY
BOTZ

Technology

79.0%
31.8%

Healthcare

8.6%
9.0%

Basic Materials

7.7%
0.0%

Industrials

4.7%
48.6%

Communication Services

-

4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

TINY
79.0%
BOTZ
31.8%

Healthcare

TINY
8.6%
BOTZ
9.0%

Basic Materials

TINY
7.7%
BOTZ
0.0%

Industrials

TINY
4.7%
BOTZ
48.6%

Communication Services

TINY

-

BOTZ
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TINY

-

BOTZ
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

TINY

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Energy

TINY

-

BOTZ
0.5%

Financial Services

TINY

-

BOTZ
0.9%

Real Estate

TINY

-

BOTZ

-

Utilities

TINY

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINY vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TINYBOTZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.52

1.24

+2.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.97

1.87

+2.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.22

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.85

1.53

+5.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.13

5.26

+18.87

TINY vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TINYBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

1.24

+2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.44

+0.13

Drawdowns

TINY vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINYBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.79%

-55.54%

+11.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.75%

-19.34%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.13%

-29.02%

-13.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.27%

+3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-18.32%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

5.63%

-0.88%

Volatility

TINY vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 7.77%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINYBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.04%

7.77%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.40%

18.40%

+8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.66%

23.98%

+8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.37%

26.73%

+5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.37%

25.73%

+6.64%

TINY vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINY vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.18%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINY and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TINY has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to BOTZ (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 31.25% vs 12.97% for BOTZ. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 12.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.18% for TINY.

TINY is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.68% for BOTZ.

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINY and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer