TINY vs. BOTZ
TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINY returned 31.25%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for BOTZ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
TINY vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 59.78% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 11.15% return.
TINY
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- 15.50%
- YTD
- 59.78%
- 6M
- 60.21%
- 1Y
- 114.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 29.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- —
TINY vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 59.78% | 19.98% | 6.63% | 47.97% | -34.14% | 8.73% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 11.15% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | -1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINY and BOTZ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between TINY and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TINY vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TINY
BOTZ
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TINY
BOTZ
Healthcare
TINY
BOTZ
Basic Materials
TINY
BOTZ
Industrials
TINY
BOTZ
Communication Services
TINY
-
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
TINY
-
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
TINY
-
BOTZ
Energy
TINY
-
BOTZ
Financial Services
TINY
-
BOTZ
Real Estate
TINY
-
BOTZ
-
Utilities
TINY
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINY vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
TINY
BOTZ
TINY vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINY | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.52 | 1.24 | +2.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.97 | 1.87 | +2.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.22 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.85 | 1.53 | +5.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.13 | 5.26 | +18.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINY | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | 1.24 | +2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.44 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
TINY vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINY | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.79% | -55.54% | +11.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.75% | -19.34% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.13% | -29.02% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.27% | +3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -18.32% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 5.63% | -0.88% |
Volatility
TINY vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 7.77%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINY | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.04% | 7.77% | +4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.40% | 18.40% | +8.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.66% | 23.98% | +8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.37% | 26.73% | +5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.37% | 25.73% | +6.64% |
TINY vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINY vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.59% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINY and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TINY has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to BOTZ (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 31.25% vs 12.97% for BOTZ. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 12.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.18% for TINY.
TINY is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.68% for BOTZ.
TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TINY and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer