TINY vs. BITU
TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TINY returned 114.15% vs -73.07% for BITU. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITU.
Performance
TINY vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 59.78% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -52.92% return.
TINY
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- 15.50%
- YTD
- 59.78%
- 6M
- 60.21%
- 1Y
- 114.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITU
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -34.84%
- YTD
- -52.92%
- 6M
- -59.11%
- 1Y
- -73.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TINY vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 59.78% | 19.98% | -9.44% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -52.92% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINY and BITU is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | 0.38 |
TINY vs. BITU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TINY
BITU
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TINY
BITU
-
Healthcare
TINY
BITU
-
Basic Materials
TINY
BITU
-
Industrials
TINY
BITU
-
Communication Services
TINY
-
BITU
-
Consumer Cyclical
TINY
-
BITU
-
Consumer Defensive
TINY
-
BITU
-
Energy
TINY
-
BITU
-
Financial Services
TINY
-
BITU
Real Estate
TINY
-
BITU
-
Utilities
TINY
-
BITU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINY vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
TINY
BITU
TINY vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINY | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 0.84 | +0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.85 | -0.93 | +7.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.13 | -1.47 | +25.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINY | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | -0.84 | +4.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | -0.35 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
TINY vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and BITU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINY | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.79% | -78.94% | +35.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.75% | -78.94% | +62.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -78.94% | +78.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -34.49% | +18.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 49.84% | -45.09% |
Volatility
TINY vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) is 12.04%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that TINY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINY | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.04% | 18.99% | -6.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.40% | 69.41% | -43.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.66% | 87.00% | -54.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.37% | 97.45% | -65.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.37% | 97.45% | -65.08% |
TINY vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINY vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than BITU's 83.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 83.36% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINY and BITU have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to TINY (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs BITU's -78.94%.
On 1-year performance, TINY leads with 114.15% vs -73.07% for BITU. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TINY has been the lower-risk option at 12.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TINY has performed better with a 114.15% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 0.18% for TINY.
TINY is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.95% for BITU.
TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TINY and BITU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer