PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINY vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINY vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 59.78% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -52.92% return.


TINY

1D
2.63%
1M
15.50%
YTD
59.78%
6M
60.21%
1Y
114.15%
3Y*
31.25%
5Y*
10Y*

BITU

1D
-5.58%
1M
-34.84%
YTD
-52.92%
6M
-59.11%
1Y
-73.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
59.78%19.98%-9.44%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-52.92%-37.07%37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and BITU is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

0.38

TINY vs. BITU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TINY
BITU

Technology

79.0%

-

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Basic Materials

7.7%

-

Industrials

4.7%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TINY
79.0%
BITU

-

Healthcare

TINY
8.6%
BITU

-

Basic Materials

TINY
7.7%
BITU

-

Industrials

TINY
4.7%
BITU

-

Communication Services

TINY

-

BITU

-

Consumer Cyclical

TINY

-

BITU

-

Consumer Defensive

TINY

-

BITU

-

Energy

TINY

-

BITU

-

Financial Services

TINY

-

BITU
4.2%

Real Estate

TINY

-

BITU

-

Utilities

TINY

-

BITU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINY vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TINYBITUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

0.84

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.85

-0.93

+7.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.13

-1.47

+25.60

TINY vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TINYBITUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

-0.84

+4.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

-0.35

+0.92

Drawdowns

TINY vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINYBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.79%

-78.94%

+35.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.75%

-78.94%

+62.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-78.94%

+78.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-34.49%

+18.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

49.84%

-45.09%

Volatility

TINY vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) is 12.04%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that TINY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINYBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.04%

18.99%

-6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.40%

69.41%

-43.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.66%

87.00%

-54.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.37%

97.45%

-65.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.37%

97.45%

-65.08%

TINY vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINY vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than BITU's 83.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
83.36%50.23%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.18%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINY and BITU have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to TINY (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs BITU's -78.94%.

On 1-year performance, TINY leads with 114.15% vs -73.07% for BITU. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TINY has been the lower-risk option at 12.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TINY has performed better with a 114.15% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 0.18% for TINY.

TINY is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.95% for BITU.

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINY and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer