PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINT vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINT vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 25.24% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return.


TINT

1D
-2.01%
1M
9.06%
YTD
25.24%
6M
25.40%
1Y
44.33%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINT vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
25.24%16.13%-13.37%20.04%-28.14%1.71%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%12.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TINT and TQQQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.72

The correlation between TINT and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

TINT vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TINT
TQQQ

Basic Materials

22.9%
1.1%

Technology

10.9%
53.8%

Industrials

4.3%
2.8%

Financial Services

3.6%
0.2%

Healthcare

2.2%
4.2%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Basic Materials

TINT
22.9%
TQQQ
1.1%

Technology

TINT
10.9%
TQQQ
53.8%

Industrials

TINT
4.3%
TQQQ
2.8%

Financial Services

TINT
3.6%
TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

TINT
2.2%
TQQQ
4.2%

Communication Services

TINT

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TINT

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

TINT

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

TINT

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Real Estate

TINT

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

TINT

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINT vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINT
TINT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINT vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TINTTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.75

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

12.27

-3.06

TINT vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINT and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TINTTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.92

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.74

-0.64

Drawdowns

TINT vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINTTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.36%

-81.66%

+40.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.53%

-36.97%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.42%

-58.04%

+27.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-0.76%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-18.52%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

11.28%

-6.45%

Volatility

TINT vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) is 10.66%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that TINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINTTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.66%

13.29%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.90%

36.04%

-16.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.75%

47.60%

-23.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.46%

66.53%

-43.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

65.96%

-42.50%

TINT vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINT vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
0.98%1.27%1.47%0.99%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINT and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to TINT (10.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINT dropped -41.36% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 3-year performance, TQQQ leads with 69.49% vs 10.12% for TINT. On fees, TINT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TINT has been the lower-risk option at 10.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 69.49% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TINT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

TINT is categorized as Energy Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINT and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer