TINT vs. MLPI
TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINT is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while MLPI is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Neos. TINT is passively managed, while MLPI is actively managed. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TINT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.
Performance
TINT vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly lower than MLPI's 18.15% return.
TINT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- YTD
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 26.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.41%
MLPI
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.44M | $21.53M | $19.40M | |
| $21.03K | $17.30K | $33.22K |
TINT vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF | 15.69% | 1.50% |
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 18.15% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINT and MLPI is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINT vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank
TINT
MLPI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TINT vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TINT | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINT vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and MLPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINT | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.36% | -5.38% | -35.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.48% | -3.36% | -6.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.64% | -1.63% | -19.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.63% | — | — |
Volatility
TINT vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINT | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.72% | 13.31% | +11.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 13.31% | +10.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 13.31% | +10.17% |
TINT vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINT vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison
TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than MLPI's 8.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 8.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF | 1.19% | 1.27% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 1.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINT and MLPI have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TINT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TINT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.
MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 1.19% for TINT.
TINT is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPI is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.68% for MLPI.
Find the right allocation for TINT and MLPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer