TINT vs. GXPE
TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - TINT tracks the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net while GXPE tracks the MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. TINT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.
Performance
TINT vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 25.11% return, which is significantly lower than GXPE's 30.84% return.
TINT
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 25.11%
- 6M
- 25.92%
- 1Y
- 43.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPE
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 30.84%
- 6M
- 28.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TINT vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF | 25.11% | 4.91% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 30.84% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINT and GXPE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINT vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank
TINT
GXPE
TINT vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINT | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINT | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 2.15 | -2.06 |
Drawdowns
TINT vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and GXPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINT | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.36% | -12.37% | -28.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -7.12% | +5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.12% | -3.23% | -17.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | — | — |
Volatility
TINT vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINT | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.73% | 20.38% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.45% | 20.38% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.45% | 20.38% | +3.07% |
TINT vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINT vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison
TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than GXPE's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 0.92% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF | 0.98% | 1.27% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 1.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINT and GXPE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINT.
TINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.92% for GXPE.
TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.15% for GXPE.
Find the right allocation for TINT and GXPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer